![]() ![]() Please also note that the screenshots below are taken from the Windows version, so if you’re using AfterShot Pro for Mac or Linux the interface will look slightly different. ![]() Instead, we’ll look at the most common uses of the program, as well as anything that makes it stand out from the other RAW editors on the market. A Closer Review of Corel AfterShot Pro 3ĪfterShot Pro 3 is a large program, with a number of different features that we don’t have time or space to go into. My training as a graphic designer also included courses on user interface design, which helps me sort the good programs from the bad.ĭisclaimer: Corel provided me with no compensation or free software in exchange for this review, nor have they had any kind of editorial review or input on the content. ![]() Over the course of my photographic practice, I’ve experimented with a number of different workflows and image editors, giving me a wide range of insight into just what can be expected from a top-notch program. I trained as a graphic designer while teaching myself photography at the same time, eventually working as a product photographer shooting everything from jewelry to artistic furniture. ![]() Hi, my name is Thomas Boldt, and I’ve been working with image editing software for over 15 years. The best way to find out is to read this review and then test it for yourself! Why Trust Me for This Review If you’re not interested in doing localized edits, though, AfterShot’s compact one-screen workflow and better initial rendering might be able to convince you to switch programs. Speedy batching is great, but AfterShot’s clumsy localized editing has a long way to go to catch up to Lightroom’s excellent local options. While seems to be faster, there are still some issues that Corel will have to overcome to properly challenge Lightroom. AfterShot Pro uses its own proprietary algorithm to render RAW images, and it almost always produces better results than ACR. Lightroom uses the Adobe Camera RAW (ACR) algorithm to render images, which often come out with narrower tonal ranges and slightly washed-out colors. One of the most interesting differences between Lightroom and AfterShot Pro is the way they render the same RAW images. Front and center on the AfterShot Pro website is a claim that the latest version handles batch editing up to 4 times faster than Lightroom, and you can read the datasheet they published here (PDF). Is Corel AfterShot Pro Better Than Adobe Lightroom?ĪfterShot Pro is Corel’s direct challenge to Adobe Lightroom’s dominance of the RAW editing market, and they aren’t ashamed to admit it. A Closer Review of Corel AfterShot Pro 3.Is Corel AfterShot Pro Better Than Adobe Lightroom?.Compare one or several images in one view, set presets and track image history. Organize and search photos by name, date, rating, tag, label, ISO, shutter speed or aperture. Easily manage your photos and design the workflow that meets your needs.Control exposure, temp, highlight recovery, white balance and more with extensive color accurate photo adjustments. Refine an unlimited number of photos while preserving your originals.Adjust one or thousands of photos with powerful batch processing controls. Save time and get results sooner with the world’s fastest RAW conversion software! Quickly load, edit and process large RAW files.Import, process and output faster, and get back behind the camera where you belong with AfterShot Pro 3. It’s the photo editor that reveals your true creative potential and frees you: from high costs, from endless subscriptions, from hours spent editing at your computer. Corel AfterShot Pro 3 is up to 4x faster than Adobe Lightroom. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |